<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random Social Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3rd-idea.com/2009/07/random-social-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3rd-idea.com/2009/07/random-social-thoughts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=random-social-thoughts</link>
	<description>Social CRM, branding, and customer experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.3rd-idea.com/2009/07/random-social-thoughts/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Meaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3rd-idea.com/?p=47#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Regarding the trust issue, I don&#039;t necessarily see the results as that opposed.  The different results may have most to do with how the question was asked (ie, if the word &#039;anonymous&#039; was used in the results that measured trust at 33%).  I think most people will trust &#039;sparkleponies99&#039; over &#039;anonymous&#039;, just because it seems like a real person, even if sparkleponies33 is equally possibly an executive at a the company selling the product.

I think the most important thing a company who wants to be trusted can do is simply to be trustworthy.  It&#039;s better for a company to enable and encourage their customers to post a review of their product than to post their own positive reviews anonymously, even though the result (positive reviews) may be the same, especially since self-promotion efforts on review sites can be pretty transparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the trust issue, I don&#8217;t necessarily see the results as that opposed.  The different results may have most to do with how the question was asked (ie, if the word &#8216;anonymous&#8217; was used in the results that measured trust at 33%).  I think most people will trust &#8216;sparkleponies99&#8242; over &#8216;anonymous&#8217;, just because it seems like a real person, even if sparkleponies33 is equally possibly an executive at a the company selling the product.</p>
<p>I think the most important thing a company who wants to be trusted can do is simply to be trustworthy.  It&#8217;s better for a company to enable and encourage their customers to post a review of their product than to post their own positive reviews anonymously, even though the result (positive reviews) may be the same, especially since self-promotion efforts on review sites can be pretty transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

